1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 41 F.Supp.
  5. 41 F.Supp. 996 (1941)
 

SWIFT & CO. v. UNITED STATES

Civil Action No. 2188.

41 F.Supp. 996 (1941)

SWIFT & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

June 4, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edgar B. Kixmiller and Ross Dean Rynder, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

E. M. Reidy and D. H. Kunkel, both of Washington, D.C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Smith R. Brittingham, Jr., and Thurman Arnold, both of Washington, D.C. (Daniel W. Knowlton, Chief Counsel, of Washington, D.C., and J. Albert Woll, U. S. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for the United States.

Before SPARKS, Circuit Judge, and SULLIVAN and IGOE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the court makes the following findings of fact and states the following conclusions of law upon the entire record in the above-entitled action:

Findings of Fact

1. By complaint filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission on September 20, 1937, against the Alton Railroad Company and other common carriers by railroad, Swift & Company, G. H. Hammond Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases