1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 34 F.Supp.
  5. 34 F.Supp. 928 (1940)
 

HAMILTON v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO.

No. 20221.

34 F.Supp. 928 (1940)

HAMILTON v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO., Inc.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

May 9, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hammond, Hoyt & Rand, of Youngstown, Ohio, and Payer, Corrigan, Bleiweiss & Cook, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Harrington, Huxley & Smith, of Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., and Jerome N. Curtis, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio, amicus curiæ.

WILKIN, District Judge.

This cause came on for determination of the motion of the defendant (filed March 2, 1940) to dissolve the preliminary injunction granted February 26, 1940. At the presentation of the issue in open court on March 12, 1940, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio was granted leave to appear, amicus curiae, and participate in the argument. Thereafter, he requested an extension of time for presentation of affidavits. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases