1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 34 F.Supp.
  5. 34 F.Supp. 892 (1940)
 

RICHE v. COE

No. 1153.

34 F.Supp. 892 (1940)

RICHE v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

June 28, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Schulze and Bacon & Thomas, all of Washington, D. C., and John F. McCanna and Edward A. Morsbach (of McCanna, Wintercorn and Morsbach), both of Rockford, Ill., for plaintiff.

W. W. Cochran, Sol. of Patent Office, and Jos. L. Kelly, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BAILEY, Justice.

Findings of Fact.

1. In this action, brought under the provisions of Section 4915, Revised Statutes, U.S.C., Title 35, Sec. 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, plaintiff seeks to have the Court authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue to plaintiff Arthur L. Riche a patent on his application, Ser. No. 369,592, filed June 10, 1929, containing Claims 17, 54, 55, 56, 64, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 and 73, as set out in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases