1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 775 (1940)
 

THE ARTHUR CONNERS

35 F.Supp. 775 (1940)

THE ARTHUR CONNERS. CONNERS MARINE CO., Inc., v. PETER F. CONNOLLY CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 31, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Purdy & Lamb, of New York City (Edmund F. Lamb, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

John P. Smith, of New York City (Charles F. Bachmann, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Libellant moves for an order sustaining its objections to certain interrogatories propounded to libellant and annexed to respondent's answer herein. The allegations of the libel and the answer are well summarized in the following extract from respondent's brief:

The libellant alleges that on the morning of November 9, 1939, the tug "Arthur Conners" was proceeding down the Raritan River with the scow "William D. McCoy" in tow. That...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases