1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 745 (1940)
 

SHIMADZU v. ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERY CO.

No. 7727.

35 F.Supp. 745 (1940)

SHIMADZU et al. v. ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERY CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

October 8, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Braselton, Whitcomb & Davies, Edmund B. Whitcomb, and George H. Souther, all of Toledo, Ohio, Hunt, Hill & Betts, Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., and George Yamaoka, all of New York City, and Rawle & Henderson and Joseph W. Henderson, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Augustus B. Stoughton, of Philadelphia, Pa., Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., A. F. Kwis, of Cleveland, Ohio, and E. S. W. Farnum, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This case at first involved the validity and infringement of a group of six patents having to do with the production of lead powder for use in making storage battery plates. They will be referred to by their abbreviated numbers. We are now directly concerned with the validity and infringement of one of them (1,548,149) and, incidentally, with the scope of another (1,548,150). These two patents issued on the same day, May 11, 1926. '150...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases