1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 688 (1940)
 

McINERNEY v. WM. F. McDONALD CONST. CO.

No. 185.

35 F.Supp. 688 (1940)

McINERNEY v. WM. F. McDONALD CONST. CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

November 22, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guggenheimer & Untermyer, of New York City (Abraham Shamos, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City (Clair V. Johnson, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

BYERS, District Judge.

There are before the court cross-motions as follows:

That of September 18, 1940, by the defendant, seeking:

(1) To restrict the plaintiff to dates not earlier than June 21, 1924, for conception, disclosure and reduction to practise of the invention of the patent in suit, according to plaintiff's answers to defendant's interrogatories I to IV, inclusive, filed on October 24, 1939.

(2) To require the plaintiff to specify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases