1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 676 (1940)
 

ELECTRIC PLUG, INC. v. VYBRO CORPORATION

No. 171.

36 F.Supp. 676 (1940)

ELECTRIC PLUG, Inc., v. VYBRO CORPORATION, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 6, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair, Curtis & Hayward, of New York City (Daniel L. Morris and James L. Black, Jr., both of New York City, and Edward A. Tyler, of Fairfield, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Daggett & Hooker, of New Haven, Conn., and Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, for defendant.

INCH, District Judge.

This is the usual patent suit, with the exception that the only issue presented is that of the validity of the patent.

Defendant concedes that if the patent is valid it has been infringed.

The parties are the Electric Plug, Inc., owner of the patent, and Vybro Corporation, Inc., the nominal defendant. However, the defense of this suit has been carried on by the New York Merchandise Company, Inc., and it has been duly stipulated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases