1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 35 (1940)
 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL R. CO.

No. 8506.

35 F.Supp. 35 (1940)

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

July 11, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison F. Lyman and William R. Woodward, both of Boston, Mass. (Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for General Electric Co.

Bair & Freeman, of Chicago, Ill. (W. P. Bair and Will Freeman, both of Chicago, Ill., and Thomas J. Byrne, of New York City, of counsel), for Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.

INCH, District Judge.

For convenience the court will refer in this memorandum to the Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company as Honeywell and the General Electric Company as General Electric.

The litigation started by patent suits brought by the Brown Instrument Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell, against General Electric. General Electric countered with the patent suit against Honeywell. Both suits related to the same subject matter and could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases