1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 664 (1940)
 

CLAIR v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.

Nos. 267, 277.

36 F.Supp. 664 (1940)

CLAIR et al. v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. SAME v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

December 30, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. W. Prince, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Thomas E. Scofield, of Kansas City, Mo., and Armand E. Lackenbach, of New York City, for defendants.

OTIS, District Judge.

These cases originally were pending before Judge Reeves. On August 20, 1940, they were transferred to me. They were set for trial on September 25, 1940, continued from that setting on plaintiffs' application and again set for trial on December 23, 1940. They have been tried together.

The bill alleges infringement by defendants of plaintiffs' patents No. 1,317,912 (the Dyer patent), issued October 7, 1919, and No. 1,577,821 (the Campbell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases