1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 33 F.Supp.
  5. 33 F.Supp. 602 (1940)
 

MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO. v. COE

No. 66409.

33 F.Supp. 602 (1940)

MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

January 25, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. Kinney, of St. Paul, Minn., H. H. Benjamin, of Washington, D. C., Paul Carpenter, of Chicago, Ill., and J. T. Basseches, of New York City, for plaintiff.

W. W. Cochran and E. T. Newton, Patent Office, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BAILEY, Justice.

The above entitled cause having been tried on December 13, 1939, after due consideration the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c:

Findings of Fact

1. This suit was brought under the provisions of Section 4915, R.S., as amended (U.S.C., Title 35, § 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63), by the Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases