1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 33 F.Supp.
  5. 33 F.Supp. 12 (1940)
 

TUBLITZ v. HIRSCHFELD

No. 164.

33 F.Supp. 12 (1940)

TUBLITZ et al. v. HIRSCHFELD et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 29, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Apfel & Apfel, of New York City (Joseph R. Apfel, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., of New York City (Edward F. Sweeney, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

This is a pretrial hearing to dispose of the issues raised by the first affirmative defense set forth in the answer of the defendants. This defense raises the issue that the cause of action herein is barred because it was not brought within the period of time allowed therefor under the laws of the State of Connecticut.

On August 2, 1937, a collision occurred in the State of Connecticut between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases