1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 347 (1940)
 

TEXAS CO. v. ANDERSON-PRICHARD REFINING CORPORATION

No. 1485.

32 F.Supp. 347 (1940)

TEXAS CO. v. ANDERSON-PRICHARD REFINING CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

March 7, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ames, Cochran, Monnet, Hayes & Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Newton A. Burgess, of New York City, Brady Cole, of Houston, Tex., Benjamin B. Schneider, of Chicago, Ill., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Ames, Thiess, Olsen & Mecklenburger, of Chicago, Ill., and Jarman, Brown, Looney & Watts, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Arthur C. Denison, of Cleveland, Ohio, and J. Bernhard Thiess, Thorley von Holst, Sidney Neuman, and Robert W. Poore, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendant.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is a patent case involving oil cracking process Patent No. 1,883,850 issued October 18, 1932, to Otto Behimer and assigned to the plaintiff company. The set-up of this law suit portends a battle of the giants in the petroleum refining industry. The record discloses that the principal patents involving oil cracking in the industry are concentrated in two corporations known as the Universal Oil Products Company, which is a subsidiary controlled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases