1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 239 (1940)
 

PROFILM CORPORATION v. BLUMENSTOCK

31 F.Supp. 239 (1940)

PROFILM CORPORATION v. BLUMENSTOCK et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 2, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Chandler, Harry C. Bierman, and Stephen H. Philbin, all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Darby & Darby, of New York City (Walter A. Darby and Samuel E. Darby, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this cause is —

1. That Claims Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of United States Patent No. 1,781,834 are valid and were infringed by the defendant.

2. That, accordingly, there should be an interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff providing for the usual injunction, carrying costs and all taxable disbursements and allowances, and referring the cause to a master to report to this Court on the damages suffered by the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases