1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 34 F.Supp.
  5. 34 F.Supp. 146 (1940)
 

AUTOMATIC DEVICES CORP. v. CUNO ENGINEERING CORP.

Civ. A. No. 97.

34 F.Supp. 146 (1940)

AUTOMATIC DEVICES CORPORATION v. CUNO ENGINEERING CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 7, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, of New York City, and James T. Kline, and George F. Smyth, both of Bridgeport, Conn., for plaintiff.

Charles M. Lyman and Clarence W. Bronson, both of New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

1. Plaintiff is a corporation of Connecticut. It is a patent holding company and does not manufacture or sell cigar lighters. Defendant is a Connecticut Corporation located in Meriden, Connecticut, where it has long been engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigar lighters. The expense of this action is being borne by plaintiff's licensee, Casco Products Corporation, also a Connecticut corporation.

2. This is an action under the patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases