1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 108 (1940)
 

MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS v. AGRICULTURAL P. COM'N

No. 564-J Civil.

35 F.Supp. 108 (1940)

MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS et al. v. AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

October 7, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crump & Rogers, Guy Richards Crump, Maurice Rogers, and Emmet H. Wilson, Jr., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., of California, Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Atty. Gen., and George E. Farrand, Edward E. Tuttle, and Stephen M. Farrand, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

Before STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, and HOLLZER and A. F. ST. SURE, District Judges.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, lemon growers in and shippers from the State of California, seek to restrain permanently the enforcement of a prorate lemon marketing program prescribed under the authority of the California Agricultural Prorate Act, Chap. 754, p. 1969, Cal. Stats. 1933, as amended, St. 1935, pp. 1526, 2087, hereinafter called the Act. They claim that the enforcement of the program would irreparably damage them and submit them to penalties should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases