1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 968 (1939)
 

FLORIDIN CO. v. ATTAPULGUS CLAY CO.

No. 1247.

26 F.Supp. 968 (1939)

FLORIDIN CO. v. ATTAPULGUS CLAY CO. et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

March 14, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Malloy, of Wilmington, Del., John J. Darby and George W. Porter (of Cushman, Darby & Cushman), all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Herbert L. Cohen, of Wilmington, Del., Merrell E. Clark, and Paul R. Ames (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), all of New York City, for defendants.

NIELDS, District Judge.

Motions by plaintiff for production of documents under rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and for an order compelling answers to certain questions under rule 37; and defendants' motion to terminate or limit examination under rule 30.

This is a suit for infringement of Hartshorne patent No. 2,079,854, granted May 11, 1937, and assigned to plaintiff. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases