DAWKINS, District Judge.
This case was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs, but on appeal, was reversed in part, because it was decided that the District Court had ruled erroneously upon the issue of prescription. In remanding the case, the Court of Appeals said: "The judgment appealed from is affirmed so far as the verdict of the jury fixes the market value of the gas upon which plaintiff is entitled to recover royalties and so far as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.