1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 915 (1939)
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. v. PAYNE

25 F.Supp. 915 (1939)

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. et al. v. PAYNE.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 6, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hans V. Briesen, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

John L. Ridley, of Jersey City, N. J., and Edward J. Leon, Donald Brown, and Harold Weill, all of New York City, for defendant.

CLARK, District Judge.

This patent suit does not follow the usual pattern. The issue here is one of human rather than mechanical relations; this because in that last aspect there is no complication. The two patents (Dickinson, No. 1,742,497, Exhibit P. 1, Dickinson, No. 1,793,068, Exhibit P. 2) in litigation involve a device all too familiar to an ailing race. As it is all too familiar, it is and by the same token correspondingly important. The particular improvement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases