1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 858 (1939)
 

IN RE GLADSTONE

28 F.Supp. 858 (1939)

In re GLADSTONE et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 24, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Joseph P. Martin, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), in support of the information.

Walter H. Pollak, with whom were associated as counsel Charles E. McMahon, and Mordecai Rochlin, all of New York City, for defendant Milton Gladstone.

Kaufman & Weitzner, of New York City, Samuel H, Kaufman and Eugene M. Parter, both of New York City, of counsel, for defendant David J. Lewis.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this proceeding is for the Government; and the relief which I grant, for the reasons hereinafter stated, against the respondents Gladstone and Lewis is:

1. I hold that the respondent Milton Gladstone is in contempt of this Court, and, as his punishment therefor, because this record shows that he is not a fit person to be an attorney of this Court, I hold that his petition for admission to the Bar of this Court should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases