1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 847 (1939)
 

CHENEY CO. v. CUNNINGHAM

No. 215.

29 F.Supp. 847 (1939)

CHENEY CO. v. CUNNINGHAM et al.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

October 17, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Marine, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Emery, Booth, Holcombe & Miller, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Stebbins, Blenko & Parmelee, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

February 9, 1939, plaintiff filed a civil action charging defendants with infringement of Patents Nos. 1,715,000; 1,728,955; and 1,939,619 — all for metal flashings.

Defendants, in their answer, filed a counterclaim in which in paragraphs 1 to 10 inclusive, they asked a declaratory judgment as to another of plaintiff's patents, i. e., No. 1,871,585, also for metal flashings. Thereafter, plaintiff filed a supplemental complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases