1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 695 (1939)
 

WINCHESTER MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 42518.

29 F.Supp. 695 (1939)

WINCHESTER MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

March 6, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claude E. Koss, of New York City (H. Stanley Hinrichs and Oscar P. Mast, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

George H. Foster, of Washington, D. C., and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert N. Anderson, Fred K. Dyar, and G. W. Billings, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for new trial is based upon alleged errors in the findings of fact. Particular stress is laid upon a letter sent to the Commissioner dated March 10, 1932, quoted in Finding 7 as showing that the plaintiff claimed a reduction in the value of the material content of its inventory. To avoid any misunderstanding of the letter, it may be well to explain clearly to what it referred. The letter did make a claim on account of materials, but as said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases