1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 650 (1939)
 

JOHNSON & GOULD v. JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING CO.

No. 25.

28 F.Supp. 650 (1939)

JOHNSON & GOULD v. JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING CO.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

September 1, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whitaker & Whitaker, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Sizer, Chambless & Kefauver, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and Walter D. Corrigan, Sr., and Francis H. Parson, both of Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

DARR, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought action in this court against Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company, a Wisconsin corporation. The motion sets out that the defendant is not in court as to the second and third counts of the complaint because of want of proper service of process.

The original complaint was filed January 31, 1939. On February 20, 1939, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for want of proper service or for want of jurisdiction of person. Thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases