1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 636 (1939)
 

RED RIVER REFINING CO. v. SUN OIL CO.

Nos. 9337, 9339.

29 F.Supp. 636 (1939)

RED RIVER REFINING CO. v. SUN OIL CO. PETROLEUM DERIVATIVES, INC., OF MAINE, v. SAME.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 29, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey L. Lechner, Roy F. Steward, and Mitford C. Massie, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Frank S. Busser and Geo. J. Harding, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

These two suits are for infringement of three patents, all having to do with the production of lubricating oils from petroleum by distillation. They are Nos. 1,448,709 to Schultze, 2,017,820 to Schultze, and 1,727,380 to Ryder. For convenience they will be discussed as though there was one suit and one plaintiff.

Of the claims in suit 27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49 of the '709 patent, 19, 20...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases