1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 583 (1939)
 

FISCHBACK v. SOLVAY PROCESS CO.

No. 220.

29 F.Supp. 583 (1939)

FISCHBACK v. SOLVAY PROCESS CO.

District Court, N. D. New York.

September 19, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar J. Brown, of Syracuse, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Hiscock, Cowie, Bruce & Lee, of Syracuse, N. Y., for defendant.

BRYANT, District Judge.

The motion for bill of particulars, now under consideration, must be limited to information necessary to enable defendant to prepare its answer. Tully v. Howard et. al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 6.

I have attempted to determine the particulars, not set forth in the complaint, which defendant requires for that purpose. I direct that plaintiff answer paragraphs one, two, three, eight, nine and ten of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases