1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 579 (1939)
 

JAMES HEDDON'S SONS v. CALLENDER

No. 68.

29 F.Supp. 579 (1939)

JAMES HEDDON'S SONS v. CALLENDER.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

August 3, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce W. Sanborn, of St. Paul, Minn., and Banning & Banning, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Callender & Luxford, of St. Paul, Minn., for defendant.

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

The complainant alleges that its trade-marked and branded articles were advertised, offered for sale and sold in the State of Minnesota and elsewhere by the defendant after he received notice of the existence of the negotiation of certain Fair Trade contracts by the plaintiff with retailers in the State of Minnesota.

The complaint does not show that the said merchandise, which was sold by the defendant, was acquired by him after notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases