1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 307 U.S.
  5. 307 U.S. 243 (1939)
 

MAYTAG CO. v. HURLEY CO.

No. 76.

307 U.S. 243 (1939)

59 S.Ct. 857

83 L.Ed. 1264

MAYTAG COMPANY v. HURLEY MACHINE CO. ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 22, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Wallace R. Lane, with whom Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Nelson E. Johnson, and Oscar W. Jeffery were on the brief, for the Maytag Company.

Mr. William H. Davis, with whom Messrs. Dean S. Edmonds and George E. Faithfull were on the brief, for respondents in Nos. 76 and 77, and petitioner in No. 661.

MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

These are patent infringement suits in which certiorari was granted because of a conflict of decision.1 Apparatus claims 23, 26, and 29 of the Snyder patent, No. 1,866,779, which are here involved, have been held invalid in the Second Circuit by reason of anticipation; and have been adjudged valid in the Eighth Circuit. We need not resolve the conflict, since we are of opinion the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases