1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 418 (1939)
 

NACHOD & UNITED STATES SIGNAL CO. v. AUTOMATIC SIGNAL CORPORATION

No. 2712.

26 F.Supp. 418 (1939)

NACHOD & UNITED STATES SIGNAL CO., Inc., et al. v. AUTOMATIC SIGNAL CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 18, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. Clay Lindsey, of Hartford, Conn., and William S. Hodges, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

J. Dwight Dana, of New Haven, Conn., and Clifton V. Edwards and D. Gordon Angus, both of New York City, for defendants.

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is a bill under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, brought originally against The Engineering and Research Corporation as assignee of the entire interest of the successful applicant, and against Automatic Signal Corporation as the exclusive licensee of its co-defendant. On September 20, 1938, I ordered granted the motion of the defendant Automatic Signal Corporation that as to it the bill be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases