1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 18 (1939)
 

IN RE NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.

No. 16562.

26 F.Supp. 18 (1939)

In re NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 16, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. W. Meyer, Gen. Counsel, and Hermon J. Wells, both of New Haven, Conn. (Fleming James, Jr., of New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for trustees, New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

White & Case, Joseph M. Hartfield, and Fitzhugh McGrew, all of New York City, and Wiggin & Dana and Stewart H. Jones, both of New Haven, Conn., for Bankers Trust Co.

Malcolm Fooshee and John E. Masten, both of New York City, for the insurance group.

Bentley W. Warren and John Noble, Jr., both of Boston, Mass., appearing specially for Boston & Providence R. Corporation.

HINCKS, District Judge.

A proper appraisal of the jurisdictional objections raised by Boston and Providence Railroad Corporation (hereinafter referred to as B P) requires a statement of facts which includes a review of certain phases of the proceedings heretofore had in this matter. Such a statement I find accurately set forth in the brief of the Old Colony trustees which I borrow for purposes of this memorandum. It is as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases