1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 44 F.Supp.
  5. 44 F.Supp. 396 (1939)
 

DWIGHT & LLOYD S. CO. v. AMERICAN ORE RECLAMATION CO.

44 F.Supp. 396 (1939)

DWIGHT & LLOYD SINTERING CO., Inc., v. AMERICAN ORE RECLAMATION CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 11, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spencer, Ordway & Wierum and Otto C. Wierum, all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, Theodore Kiendl, John L. Jackson, and A. S. Edmonds, all of New York City, for defendant.

BONDY, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to confirm the report of the special master filed pursuant to the decision of the court recommitting his report to him for further consideration. D.C., 44 F.Supp. 391.

This suit was brought for the termination and cancellation of patent licensing agreements, an accounting of royalties and incidental relief. The defendant no longer urges its counterclaim. It has amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases