1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 344 (1939)
 

GROSJEAN v. PANTHER-PANCO RUBBER CO.

No. 4454.

26 F.Supp. 344 (1939)

GROSJEAN et al. v. PANTHER-PANCO RUBBER CO., Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 31, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. L. Ely, of Akron, Ohio, and Edgar H. Kent, Robert L. Thompson and Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Melvin R. Jenney and Fish, Hildreth, Cary & Jenney, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This suit involves alleged infringement of four patents, United States Patents Nos. 1,344,503, 1,344,504, 1,650,511 and 1,687,441, all issued to James E. Grosjean. It involves, too, alleged infringement of United States Trade Mark Registrations Nos. 149,142 and 285,219. Unfair competition is also charged. In its answer, the defendant asserts non-infringement and invalidity of the various patents in suit. It also avers non-infringement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases