1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 30 F.Supp.
  5. 30 F.Supp. 275 (1939)
 

COCA COLA CO. v. DIXI-COLA LABORATORIES

No. 198.

30 F.Supp. 275 (1939)

COCA COLA CO. v. DIXI-COLA LABORATORIES, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland.

November 29, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown & Brune, Hilary W. Gans, and Charles Ruzicka, all of Baltimore, Md., Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., Nims & Verdi, of New York City, and Spalding, Sibley, Troutman & Brock, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

J. S. Mead, of Birmingham, Ala., and W. Hamilton Whiteford, of Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

At the present state of the above case, a question of practice has arisen with regard to interrogatories by the defendant to the plaintiff after the pleadings have been completed. One question presented is whether the court has discretion to limit the interrogatories by one party to the other to a reasonable number. Another question is whether interrogatories can properly be maintained when they seek answers only with regard to details of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases