1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 188 (1939)
 

KNAUST BROS. v. GOLDSCHLAG

28 F.Supp. 188 (1939)

KNAUST BROS., Inc., v. GOLDSCHLAG et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 17, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City (W. Houston Kenyon, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Charles Sonnenreich, of New York City (N. Joseph Friedman, of Catskill, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I dismiss the complaint herein on the ground that Claims Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8 of United States Patent No. 2,034,678 are invalid for want of invention.

I grant the prayer of the defendants' counterclaim asking a declaration that all the eight claims of United States Patent No. 2,034,678 and the four claims of United States Patent No. 2,097,766 are invalid for want of invention.

I grant to the defendants taxable costs and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases