1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 172 (1939)
 

GRAUMAN v. CITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK

31 F.Supp. 172 (1939)

GRAUMAN et al. v. CITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 20, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Rose, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Max D. Steuer, of New York City, for defendant City Company of New York, Inc.

Shearman & Sterling, of New York City, for defendant National City Bank of New York.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The defendants move, pursuant to Rules 8, 10, 12, and 18 of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, (1) to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds: (a) that whereas this is an action in equity it appears on the face of the complaint that no grounds for equitable jurisdiction or relief are alleged; and (b) that the plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law; or in the alternative, (2) requiring the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases