1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 30 F.Supp.
  5. 30 F.Supp. 151 (1939)
 

COOPER v. COOPER

No. 3644.

30 F.Supp. 151 (1939)

COOPER v. COOPER.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

August 25, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. E. Bindeman, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

D. F. Prince and Helen Goodner, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

LETTS, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant, with their two children, occupy the same apartment. She seeks a limited divorce and incident thereto presents her motion for alimony pendente lite. She invokes the rule announced in Pedersen v. Pedersen decided by our Court of Appeals on August 14, 1939, App.D.C., 107 F.2d 227.

To apply the doctrine of the Pedersen case to the facts alleged in the instant case would be a misinterpretation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases