1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 122 (1939)
 

BOYSELL CO. v. COLONIAL COVERLET CO.

No. 230.

29 F.Supp. 122 (1939)

BOYSELL CO. v. COLONIAL COVERLET CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

August 16, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Carmack Waterhouse, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Charles A. Noone, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.

DARR, District Judge.

The question is on the motion to require the defendant to make answer to certain interrogatories which were objected to by the defendant and not answered. The interrogatories were in the nature of a discovery as to the character of the machines used by the defendant.1

It is my judgment that the question is to be determined under the provisions of Rule 33, of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases