1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 112 (1939)
 

BLESSING v. CONSOLIDATED TRIMMING CORPORATION

26 F.Supp. 112 (1939)

BLESSING v. CONSOLIDATED TRIMMING CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 23, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sawyer, Kennedy, Humason & Hazell, of New York City (Horace Dawson, of Chicago, Ill., and James J. Kennedy, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Marshall & Hawley, of New York City (E. W. Marshall, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this cause is —

1. That Claims Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10, of which the validity was not questioned, were infringed by the defendant.

2. That Claims Nos. 15, 16, 17 and 18 are not, in my opinion, valid.

3. That, accordingly, there should be an interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff providing for the usual injunction, carrying costs and referring the cause to a master to report to this Court on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases