1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 93 (1939)
 

GOLDSBOROUGH v. UNITED STATES

No. 89718.

31 F.Supp. 93 (1939)

GOLDSBOROUGH (CLARK) v. UNITED STATES.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Rehearing Denied January 4, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. H. McNeill and C. L. Dawson, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

David A. Pine, U. S. Atty., and Allen Crenshaw and J. B. Costello, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

LETTS, Associate Justice.

The only hypothesis upon which a recovery may be had in this case is that the brothers of the insured were the duly designated alternate beneficiaries of his insurance. The theory of plaintiff's case is that the second application was forced and so should not be taken as superseding the original application which named the brothers as alternate beneficiaries. If the theory be warranted it must not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases