BUCK v. TRIANON CO.

Nos. 1162, 1164, 1170-1172.

26 F.Supp. 96 (1939)

BUCK et al. v. TRIANON CO., Inc., and four other cases.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

January 26, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford D. O'Brien and Herman D. Kenin, both of Portland, Or., and H. W. Haugland, of Seattle, Wash., for complainants.

Hammer & Pomeroy, Jeffrey Heiman, and Clark R. Belknap, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendants.


CUSHMAN, District Judge.

Upon defendants' part the court is asked to dismiss these suits because of the monopolistic nature of the plaintiff Society and the contracts with its members, including the corporate plaintiffs, and because of the restraint upon interstate commerce thereby caused.

This matter has been determined adversely to defendants upon the motions to strike the affirmative defenses. Such rulings were made prior to the effective date of the Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases