1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 93 (1939)
 

CRAY, McFAWN & CO. v. HEGARTY, CONROY & CO.

27 F.Supp. 93 (1939)

CRAY, McFAWN & CO. v. HEGARTY, CONROY & CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 5, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holthusen & Pinkham, of New York City (Spencer Pinkham, William F. Purcell, and Charles E. Oberle, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Mack, McCauley, Spiegelberg & Gallagher, of New York City (George A. Spiegelberg, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Hegarty, Conroy & Co., Inc.

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Louis Connick, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Atlas Corporation.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this cause is that the complaint should be dismissed as against both defendants with costs, which will include all taxable disbursements and allowances.

I. A. My subject matter jurisdiction herein is based on diversity of citizenship.

The plaintiff, Cray, McFawn & Company, is a corporation of Michigan, engaged in the business of the purchase and sale of corporate securities.

The defendant Hegarty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases