1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 30 F.Supp.
  5. 30 F.Supp. 89 (1939)
 

NEW WRINKLE v. FRITZ

Civ. No. 188.

30 F.Supp. 89 (1939)

NEW WRINKLE, Inc., v. FRITZ et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

September 6, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Albert R. Henry, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Dike, Calver & Gray, of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for defendants.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a suit for patent infringement and unfair competition practices. The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation. The defendant Pontiac Varnish Company is a Michigan corporation, and the defendant John Fritz is a resident of the Western District of New York.

This motion is made to set aside and quash the summons for lack of jurisdiction. As to the corporate defendant, the alleged lack of jurisdiction is that the corporate defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases