1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 965 (1938)
 

REFRACTOLITE CORPORATION v. PRISMO HOLDING CORPORATION

25 F.Supp. 965 (1938)

REFRACTOLITE CORPORATION v. PRISMO HOLDING CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 20, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. R. Liberman, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Hornidge & Dowd, of New York City (John B. Hayward, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

COXE, District Judge.

I think it is too clear even for argument that such a case as this cannot be disposed of on motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The issues involve the validity and alleged infringement of two unadjudicated patents, and such questions can only be adequately determined after a trial.

The motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases