1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 752 (1938)
 

O'BRIEN v. CALMAR S. S. CORPORATION

No. 20688.

25 F.Supp. 752 (1938)

O'BRIEN v. CALMAR S. S. CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

November 29, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freedman & Goldstein and Abraham E. Freedman, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Lewis, Wolff, Gourlay & Hemphill and John Hemphill, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The first question to be determined is the classic one of "where are we at". Before the new Rules of Civil Procedure this would have been a case of the granting of a non-suit, the propriety of which could have been challenged by a motion to take it off. If the motion was allowed the case would, under the Pennsylvania system of practice, automatically, result in a retrial. If refused, it would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases