1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 24 F.Supp.
  5. 24 F.Supp. 666 (1938)
 

IN RE PRUDENCE CO.

Nos. 27496, 27028.

24 F.Supp. 666 (1938)

In re PRUDENCE CO., Inc. Application of PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP. Application of CALLAGHAN et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 20, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Cradock Hughes and Emanuel Celler, both of New York City, for Trustees of Prudence Co., Inc., debtor.

Percival E. Jackson and Clinton T. Roe, both of New York City, for Prudence Securities Advisory Group.

Delafield, Thorne & Marsh, of New York City, for Hurd Committee.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion to confirm the report of the Special Master which found that certain funds of The Prudence Company, Inc., the debtor, were trust funds or funds upon which there existed an equitable lien, and therefore were not to be included in the general assets of the debtor.

The facts, which are not controverted, reveal that for an extended period prior to the "Banking Holiday" of March, 1933, the debtor entered into arrangements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases