1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 601 (1938)
 

ROSE v. METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER CORPORATION

26 F.Supp. 601 (1938)

ROSE v. METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 8, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Carmody, of New York City, for plaintiff.

J. Robert Rubin, of New York City, for defendants M. G. M. Corp., Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Co., and M. G. M. Dist. Co.

Leopold Friedman, of New York City, for defendant Loew's.

Samuel D. Cohen, of New York City, for defendant Culver Export Co.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

After carefully reading the pleadings, as well as the authorities cited by both sides, I am constrained to sustain the objections to all of plaintiff's interrogatories. It is well settled under Equity Rule 58, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, that either party to the action may, through interrogatories, question the opposite party as to ultimate facts that are material and necessary to support the alleged cause of action (or defense)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases