1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 22 F.Supp.
  5. 22 F.Supp. 359 (1938)
 

O'REILLY v. CURTIS PUB. CO.

No. 7022.

22 F.Supp. 359 (1938)

O'REILLY v. CURTIS PUB. CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 2, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dangel & Sherry and Edward M. Dangel, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Maxwell E. Foster, of Boston, Mass., Choate, Hall & Stewart, John L. Hall, John M. Hall, and Bailey Aldrich, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

McLELLAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves that pages numbered 2 and 3 of the defendant's answer to the plaintiff's amended declaration be stricken out. These pages read:

"And further answering, the defendant says that if it ever published or disseminated the written matter annexed to plaintiff's amended declaration as `B,' which includes excerpts annexed as `A,' said written matter in fact constituted an instalment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases