1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 251 (1938)
 

JAITE-GRANT DISPLAY BAG CO. v. THOMAS M. ROYAL & CO.

No. 9661.

27 F.Supp. 251 (1938)

JAITE-GRANT DISPLAY BAG CO. v. THOMAS M. ROYAL & CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 8, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Ralph Barrow, of Akron, Ohio, Caesar & Rivise, and Charles W. Rivise, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Howson & Howson, Charles H. Howson, and Charles H. Howson, Jr., all of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This is the usual form of bill charging infringement of a patent right. The patent is No. 1,970,848, issued to Richard A. Grant, and assigned to plaintiff. The patent relates to a special make of "display window bag".

The defenses are the likewise usual ones of invalidity and non-infringement. In the view we have taken it is only necessary to discuss the question of validity. The patent itself is evidence from which validity may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases