1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 24 F.Supp.
  5. 24 F.Supp. 249 (1938)
 

HANSON-VAN WINKLE-MUNNING CO. v. UNITED STATES, ETC.

No. 1002.

24 F.Supp. 249 (1938)

HANSON-VAN WINKLE-MUNNING CO. v. UNITED STATES GALVANIZING & PLATING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION.

District Court, N. D. West Virginia.

July 27, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, Steptoe & Johnson and James M. Guiher, all of Clarksburg, W. Va., and D. H. Hill Arnold, of Elkins, W. Va., for plaintiff.

Edwards, Bower & Pool, of New York City, and Robinson & Stump, of Clarksburg, W. Va., for defendant.

BAKER, District Judge.

This suit is by Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Company, a corporation, of New Jersey, with its principal office and place of business at Matawan, New Jersey, against U. S. Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation, a corporation, of the State of West Virginia, and having a place of manufacture in Brooklyn, New York. Both plaintiff and defendant are manufacturers of full automatic plating equipment machines, and are in active competition with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases