1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 190 (1938)
 

SCHICK DRY SHAVER v. GENERAL SHAVER CORPORATION

No. 2658.

26 F.Supp. 190 (1938)

SCHICK DRY SHAVER, Inc., et al. v. GENERAL SHAVER CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 30, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, by Drury W. Cooper and Abraham Tulin, all of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Fish, Richardson & Neave, Henry R. Ashton and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., all of New York City, and George H. Cohen and Thomas J. Spellacy, both of Hartford, Conn., for defendants.

THOMAS, District Judge.

This matter is now before the Court on defendants' application to show cause "why further testimony should not be taken herein and the parties further heard".

The facts which led up to the signing of the rule are set forth at length in the plaintiffs' return to the order. They may be briefly summarized and are as follows:

1. The last brief was received by the court on or about April 14, 1938, and the case was under consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases