MUTCH v. SEIGNIOUS

No. 7949.

94 F.2d 1018 (1938)

J. O. MUTCH, Whose First Name Is Unknown, and Will C. Mee, Appellants, v. Charles W. SEIGNIOUS, Jr., and Cleola Eunice Seignious, His Wife, Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 16, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weadock & Weadock, of Saginaw, Mich., and Clausen, Hirsh & Miller, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Clark & Henry, of Bay City, Mich., for appellees.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellants have failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases