1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 19 F.Supp.
  5. 19 F.Supp. 966 (1937)
 

CHASE BRASS & COPPER CO. v. CHASE METALCRAFT CORP.

19 F.Supp. 966 (1937)

CHASE BRASS & COPPER CO., Inc., v. CHASE METALCRAFT CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 7, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Rollka, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Macpeak, Flatow & Abramowitz, of New York City (Fred Flatow, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Defendant moves for an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from using in connection with the advertisement and sale of products manufactured by defendant the word "Chase" or the words "Chase Metal" or "Chasecraft" or any other word or combination of words similar to the plaintiff's alleged trade mark "Chase."

It appears that since 1900 plaintiff's predecessor corporations have all used the word "Chase" to identify their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases